PROMOTING THE ENGLISH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION USING THE THINKING INNOVATION "THINK THAI USE ENGLISH GRAMMAR" TO DEVELOP THE HUMAN CAPITAL OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT CHAIYAPHUM RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY

Main Article Content

Pichai Onchan
Assistant Professor Dr. Nutdanai Keaowphonngarm
Thammarat Rompaen

Abstract

This study employed a mixed-methods research design involving 120 first-year undergraduate students from the Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University. The objectives were 1 to examine the challenges and future aspirations related to English language use among first-year undergraduate students and 2 to evaluate the effectiveness of the ‘Think Thai Use English Grammar’ innovation in enhancing students’ communicative competence in English, utilizing pre- and post-program English proficiency tests. The results revealed several key findings: 1. Students identified three main issues with their English proficiency, namely difficulty in expressing themselves while communicating, problems with using the English language, and a lack of a real English-speaking environment to practice. However, they also expressed positive aspirations for their future English usage. These included a desire to improve their English proficiency, a willingness to learn from their mistakes in English communication, and an eagerness to interact with native speakers for professional and educational purposes. 2. Statistically, the average post-test score (23.88 ± 7.16) was significantly higher than the average pre-test score (16.03 ± 4.93) at a P < 0.05. It indicates a notable improvement in students’ English proficiency after completing the training program. Furthermore, students demonstrated a positive attitude toward developing their ability to construct appropriate English sentences for everyday conversation. Therefore, the "Think Thai Use English Grammar" program could serve as an effective alternative method for Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), emphasising the improvement of learners’ communicative proficiency in real-life communication and mechanical teaching methods, and advocating for the use of authentic materials, such as active learning through interaction. Overall, this innovation helps students enhance their English proficiency, ultimately increasing the potential of the organisation's human capital. Students suggested that this innovative approach should be applied at various educational levels and adapted to be more accessible to a broader audience.

Article Details

How to Cite
Onchan, P., Keaowphonngarm, N., & Rompaen, T. (2025). PROMOTING THE ENGLISH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION USING THE THINKING INNOVATION "THINK THAI USE ENGLISH GRAMMAR" TO DEVELOP THE HUMAN CAPITAL OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT CHAIYAPHUM RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY. Research and Development Institute Journal of Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University, 7(2), 242–260. retrieved from https://so10.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rdicpru/article/view/2344
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Pichai Onchan, Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University

Faculty of Arts and Sciences

Assistant Professor Dr. Nutdanai Keaowphonngarm, Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University

Faculty of Arts and Sciences

Thammarat Rompaen, Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University

Faculty of Arts and Sciences

References

Aimagambetov, Y. B., Gimranova, R. R., Spanova, B. K., & Omarova, A. T. (2023). Concept of human capital in the context of innovative development and its place in the system of related economic categories. Bulletin of "Turan" University”, (3), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2023-1-3-230-237

Aini, Z., Sanisah, S., & Marlina, M. (2024). Inovasi dalam Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Karyawan Serta Memperkuat Fondasi Manajemen SDM Unggul di Era Globalisasi.Sosial Simbiosis, Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 1(3), 142-151. https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v1i3.431

Assavanadda, A. & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2018). Motivation towards Learning English of Thai Political Science Undergraduate Students: A Survey Study. The New English Teacher, 12(2), 76-90.

Bai, J. (2024). The Discussion of Communicative Language Teaching in Language Classrooms. Frontiers in Sustainable Development, 4(2),1-4. https://doi.org/10.54691/jckqrt49

Baker, W. (2008). A Critical Examination of ELT in Thailand: The Role of Cultural Awareness. RELC Journal, 39(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208091144

Bunnag, S. (2005, 11 August). Test results spur curriculum change: English language teaching to be overhauled. Bangkok Post, 1.

Chan, M. Y. (2020). Guidelines for English Proficiency Development of Rajapark Institute’s Students in Preparation for ASEAN Economic Community. Asia Pacific Journal of Religions and Cultures, 4(1), 74-86.

Chen, X. (2024). A Literature Review of Communicative Language Teaching: Effectiveness and Deficiencies. Frontiers in Sustainable Development, 4(11), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.54691/29x4vp51

Czajkowski, Z., Kowalski, A. M., Michorowska, B., & Weresa, M. A. (2014). Human Capital and Innovation—Basic Concepts, Measures, and Interdependencies, Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Marzenna Anna Weresa (ed.), Innovation, Human Capital and Trade Competitiveness, edition 127 (pp.53-80), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02072-3_2

Dorokhov, M., (2022). The impact of human capital on the innovative development of the organization. Scientific notes of the Russian Academy of Entrepreneurship, 21(1), 94-98. https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-6258-2022-21-1-94-98

Education First, (2024, 28 March). EF English Proficiency Index, A ranking of 106 Countries and Regions by English Skills. https://www.ef.com/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/cefcom-epi-site/reports/2024/ef-epi-2024-english.pdf

Findikoglu, F.& Ilhan, D. (2016). Realization of the Desired Future: Innovation in Education Universal. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(11), 2574 - 2580. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041110

Foley, A. J. (2005). English in Thailand. RELC Journal, 36(2), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205055578

Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway World: How Globalization is reshaping Our Lives. Routledge.

Gupta, M. (2018). The innovation process from an idea to a final product: a review of the literature. Int. J. Comparative Management, 1(4), 400-421.

Hayes, D. (2008). Becoming a teacher of English in Thailand. Language Teaching Research,12(4), 471-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808097160

Khamratana, S. & Keowkanya, S. (2017). A Critical Analysis on Thai University Students' Reflections toward Politic of The English Language. The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2017 Official Conference Proceedings, 141-151. https://papers.iafor.org/submission34365/

Klungsaeng, K. (2021). Perceived Readiness and Needs of Undergraduate Students in Developing English Skills under the Liberalization of the ASEAN Economic Community: a Case Study of the College of Politics and Governance Mahasarakham University. Journal of Politics and Governance, 11(1), 140-162.

Liddicoat, A. J. (2004). Language policy and methodology. International Journal of English Studies, 4(1), 153-171.

Mackenzie, A. S. (2005). Current developments in EFL curriculum reform in Thailand. In 7th International Language and Development Conference, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Mahu, D. P. (2012). Why is Learning English So Beneficial Nowadays?. International Journal of Communication Research, 2(4), 347.

Mikheeva, T. & Pankova, V. (2021). On the theory of innovative education. XIV International Scientific and Practical Conference “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2021, 273, 12111. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312111

Mykhailyshyn, H., Kondur, O. & Serman, L. (2018). Innovation of Education and Educational innovations in Conditions of Modern Higher Education Institution. Journal of Vasyl Stafanyk Precarpathain National University, 5(1), 9-16.

Myltykbayeva, L. A., & Doskaliyeva, B. B. (2020). Innovative activity of human capital. REPORTS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN, 4(332), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-1483.92

Nagi, K. (2012, April 8). Status of English Language in Thailand Not Important-Education is Key issue. The Korea Herald. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10360900

Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4),589- 613. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588214

Nusartlert, A. (2017). Political Language in Thai and English: Findings and Implications for Society. Journal of Mekong Societies, 13(3),57–75. https://so03.tcithaijo.org/index.php/mekongjournal/article/view/107153

Penkala, M. (2024). The role of human capital in the innovation management process. Humanities and Social Sciences, 31(3), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2024.hss.34

Pemberton, I. (2024). Communicative Language Teaching. 47-67. In: Usage-Based Second Language Instruction. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53414-0_5

Prapaisit de Segovia, L. & Hardison, D. M. (2008). Implementing education reform: EFL teachers' perspectives. ELT Journal, 63(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn024

Phumsiri, N. & Tangkiengsirin, S. (2018). An Analysis of the Use of English with Political Correctness: A Case Study of Graduate Students in Thailand. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(4), 447-463. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.33

Popescu, C., & Diaconu, L. (2008). Human Capital and Innovation. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1099025

Poteliene, S., & Tamašauskiene, Z. (2014). Human capital conceptualization: development and concept formation. BUSINESS SYSTEMS and ECONOMICS, 4(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.13165/VSE-14-4-1-08

Punthumasen, P. (2007, December). International program for teacher education: An approach to tackling problems of English education in Thailand. In The 11th UNESCO-APEID international conference reinventing higher education: Toward participatory and sustainable development. 12-14.

Rao, P.S. (2019). The Role of English as a Global Language. Research Journal of English (RJOE),4(1), 65-79.

Rahmayanti, S., & Misral, M. (2024). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia melalui Program Pelatihan Berkelanjutan (Human Resource Development through Continuous Training Programs). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomika. 14(1), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.37859/jae.v14i1.7030

Rhekhalilit, K. and Lerdpaisaiwong, S. (2019). The Increasing Role of English in Thai Academic Publication. Manusya Journal of Humanities, 22, 335-357.

Saengboon, S. (2002). Beliefs of Thai EFL teachers about communicative language teaching. [Doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University.

Shahi, N. B. (2022). CLT and Task-Based Instruction for Effective Learning. Journal of NELTA Karnali, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.3126/jonk.v1i1.57225

Srichampa, S., Burarungrot, M., & Samoh, U. (2018). Language Planning through Policy in Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore for Unskilled Migrant Workers. Language and Linguistics, 36(2), 89-121.

Suratman, S., & Eriyanti, E. (2020, May). Peningkatan sumber daya manusia melalui pelatihan. (Enhancement of human resources through training). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 788-794.

Tang, N. K. (2020). Challenge and Importance of Teaching English as a Medium of Instruction in Thailand International College. English as an International language, 15(2), 97-118.

Tantiniranat, S. (2020). Policy direction for Thai English Language Education in an ASEAN era: aspirations vs reality. In 2nd International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE 2019). 253-257. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200318.049

Thongsri, M., Charumanee, N & Chatupote, M. (2006). The implementation of the 2001 English language curriculum in government secondary Schools in Songkhla. Thai TESOL BULLETIN, 19(1), 60- 94.

Triwibowo, F. D. (2023). Enhancing English proficiency: the impact of communicative language teaching on second language learners. Tomorrow’s Education Journal, 1(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.58660/tej.v1i2.40

Vacharaskunee, S. (2000). Target language avoidance by Thai teachers of English: Thai teachers’ beliefs. [Doctoral dissertation]. Edith Cowan University.

Watson, T. R. & Keyuravong, S. (2004) Process and Product of English Language Learning in the National Education Act, Ministry of Education Standards and Recommended Textbooks at the Secondary Level. ThaiTESOL Bulletin, 17 (1), 15-45.

Wei, L. Wan Mustapha, W. Z., & Awang, S. (2024). An Experimental Study of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in University Comprehensive English Class. International Journal of Linguistics, 16(3), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v16i3.21844

Zhao, Y. (2022). An Analysis of Communicative Language Teaching Approach Based on the International Researches. Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2022): Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 673, 40-43. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220706.010

Zhang, S. (2023). Analysis on the Application of Communicative Language Teaching in Senior High School English Class. Journal of Theory and Practice of Social Science. 3(10), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpss.2023.03(10).08