A Study of Learning Achievement and Group Working Behavior of Prathomsuksa 6 Students Using a Collaborative Learning Model, Jigsaw Technique the Social Studies, Religion, and Culture Departments

Abstract

The objectives of this research to 1) study the learning achievement in the social studies, religion, and culture Department of Prathomsuksa 6 students using a collaborative learning model, Jigsaw technique. 2) study the group working behaviors of Prathomsuksa 6 students using a collaborative learning teaching model, Jigsaw technique. The target group used in this research were Prathomsuksa 6/1 students at Ban Kham Bong School. Khon Kaen Primary Educational Service Area Office 4, semester 1, the academic year 2019, 17 people. This research was action research with three learning cycles. There was continuous reflection and improvement of activities in every cycle. The following tools were used in this study: 1) The learning management plan was used in the social studies, religion, and culture department 12 learning management plans using a collaborative learning model, jigsaw technique. 2) Group behavior observation, student interviews, and a sub-test at the end of the cycle. which was a multiple-choice test with four options and 30 questions

           The results of the research were as follows:

1. Learning achievement from teaching and learning activities in the social studies, religion, and culture departments of Prathomsuksa 6/1 students using a collaborative learning model, Jigsaw technique. It was found that the students had an academic achievement of 80.88 percent, which passed the specified criteria, and the number of students who passed the criteria accounted for 94.11 percent, higher than the number of students who passed the specified criteria of 70 percent of the total number of students.


2. The group working behavior of Prathomsuksa 6/1 students using the cooperative learning model, Jigsaw technique found that the students had group working behavior. received an average score of 2.69, which was at a good quality level. When considering each issue, it was found that all issues were of good quality. And there were 15 students who received good-quality assessment scores, representing 88.24 percent, which was higher than the 80 percent criterion for the number of students set.