USING BOTTOM-UP INSTRUCTION AND GAMES TO ENHANCE ENGLISH VOCABULARY LEARNING AMONG GRADE 5 STUDENTS

Main Article Content

Natcha Rattanapitak
Thanachart Lornklang

Abstract

Because young EFL learners benefit from systematic instruction that builds vocabulary from basic language units, integrating a bottom-up instruction with games provides both structured learning and active engagement. The research objectives of this study were: 1) to investigate the effects of teaching English using bottom-up instruction and games to enhance vocabulary learning among Grade 5 students, and 2) to study students’ satisfaction with learning English through bottom-up instruction and games. The study was a one-group pretest-posttest, pre-experimental design. The samples were 23 Grade 5 students from one of the primary schools in Noen Sa-nga District, Chaiyaphum Province. They were selected by using cluster random sampling. The instruments included four lesson plans based on bottom-up instruction, which incorporated games, an English vocabulary learning achievement test, and a questionnaire. The data were analyzed to test whether the pre-test and post-test scores were normally distributed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test. Then, using the mean (M), standard deviations (SD), and Nonparametric statistics, the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was employed.               


           The results of this research showed that the mean post-test score for English vocabulary learning achievement among participants who learned English using bottom-up instruction and games was significantly higher than the pre-test score at the .05 level. The participants’ vocabulary proficiency increased by approximately 80.6% from a mean pre-test score of 10.04 to a mean post-test score of 18.13. The participants expressed positive satisfaction, with an average score of 4.57. This study found that using bottom-up instruction and games effectively enhances vocabulary learning among Grade 5 students.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rattanapitak, N., & Lornklang, T. (2026). USING BOTTOM-UP INSTRUCTION AND GAMES TO ENHANCE ENGLISH VOCABULARY LEARNING AMONG GRADE 5 STUDENTS. Research and Development Institute Journal of Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University, 8(1), 17–29. retrieved from https://so10.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rdicpru/article/view/3091
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Natcha Rattanapitak, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Thanachart Lornklang, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

References

Ampaiphan, R. (2002). 100 Language Games (5th ed). Thai Wattanapanich.

Bansong, K. (2023). The effects of multimodal teaching on English vocabulary knowledge of Thai primary school students [Master's thesis, Mahasarakham University]. Mahasarakham University Institutional Repository. http://202.28.34.124/dspace/bitstream/123456789/1933/1/64010181002.pdf

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge University Press.

Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2001). Discourse and Context in Language Teaching: A Guide for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Crookall, D., & Oxford, R. L. (Eds.). (1990). Simulation, Gaming, and Language Learning. Newbury House.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed). Longman.

Huszti, I., Nagy-Kolozsvári, E. & Fábián, M. (2024). Digital and non-digital games in young learners EFL classroom at wartime in Ukraine. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 103(5), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v103i5.5791

Katasila, P., & Poonpon, K. (2022). The effects of blended learning instruction on vocabulary knowledge of Thai primary school students. English Language Teaching, 15(5), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n5p52

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

Moskovsky, C., Jiang, G., Libert, A., & Fagan, S. (2015). Bottom-up or top-down: English as a foreign language vocabulary instruction for Chinese university students. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 256–277. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43893753

Nation, I. S. (2022). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (3rd ed). Cambridge University Press.

Nishanthi, R. (2018). The importance of learning English in today’s world. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3(1), 871–874. https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd19061

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th ed.). Longman.

Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the Use of Content Specialists in the Assessment of Criterion-Referenced Test Item Validity. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED121845.pdf

Sukkrong, J. (2010). Learning achievement, retention, and attitude towards English vocabulary learning of students taught through games and conventional methods [Master’s thesis, Prince of Songkla University]. Thailand Library Integrated System. https://tdc.thailis.or.th/tdc/browse.php?option=show&browse_type=title&titleid=364236

Thiendathong, P., & Sukying, A. (2021). Vocabulary learning strategies used by Thai high school students in science, language, and English programs. Arab World English Journal, 12(2), 306–317. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.21