Public Perception and Readiness of Thai Citizens towards the Cell Broadcast Service for Disaster Management

Authors

  • Darut Praditsong Faculty of Management Science, Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • singh singkhajorn Faculty of Management Science, Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Perception, Thai Citizens' Readiness, National Emergency Alert System, Disaster Management

Abstract

         This research article aims to 1) explore public attitudes and opinions regarding Thailand's current disaster preparedness, and 2) study the disaster news exposure behaviors of the Thai public. This study employed a quantitative research approach. The sample consisted of 1,230 residents in Bangkok. A questionnaire was utilized as the research instrument, and the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, specifically percentage.

         The research findings are as follows: 1. Public attitudes and opinions regarding Thailand's current disaster preparedness. Regarding overall disaster preparedness, the majority of the public lacked confidence in the country's disaster response capabilities. Specifically, 52.4% perceived that the country is unprepared for disasters in general. Furthermore, respondents viewed Thailand as unprepared for specific catastrophic events, including earthquakes (51.1%), tsunamis (50.7%), and storms/flash floods (51.8%).In terms of opinions on the emergency alert system, 49.4% perceived the general warning system as unprepared, while 48.7% indicated that the government's National Emergency Alert System is not ready for practical use. Additionally, concerning the public's understanding and personal readiness for disaster response, 48.7% reported feeling unprepared or lacking understanding. 2. The disaster news exposure behaviors of the Thai public Information Channels. In the event of a disaster, the primary platforms the public would utilize to follow news updates are Facebook (46.2%), followed by X (Twitter) (35.6%), and Instagram (IG) (35.4%). In contrast, traditional communication channels were found to be less popular, such as radio (25.8%) and the government's National Emergency Alert System (25.5%).Demand for Alert System Enhancement: A significant majority, 68.5%, strongly agreed that the government should elevate and improve the efficiency of the disaster warning system.

References

กรมประชาสัมพันธ์. (2567). ระบบแจ้งเตือนภัยฉุกเฉิน “Cell Broadcast Service” ผ่านมือถือ ครั้งแรกในไทย. สืบค้นจาก https://www.prd.go.th

กรมป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัย. (2558). แผนการป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัยแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2558. กรุงเทพฯ: กระทรวงมหาดไทย.

ศูนย์วิจัยกสิกรไทย. (2567). ผลจากอุทกภัยปี 2567 คาดกระทบไม่ต่ำกว่า 30,000 ล้านบาท. สืบค้นจาก https://www.kasikornresearch.com

ไทยรัฐออนไลน์. (2568). ระบบแจ้งเตือนภัย Cell Broadcast Service (CBS) คืออะไร ต่างจาก SMS อย่างไร. สืบค้นจาก https://www.thairath.co.th

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการกิจการกระจายเสียง กิจการโทรทัศน์ และกิจการโทรคมนาคมแห่งชาติ. (2568). กสทช. เตรียมบูรณาการการแจ้งเตือนภัยพิบัติผ่านโครงข่ายโทรทัศน์ ช่องภัยพิบัติและ cell broadcast. สืบค้นจาก https://www.nbtc.go.th

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการกิจการกระจายเสียง กิจการโทรทัศน์ และกิจการโทรคมนาคมแห่งชาติ. (2565). รายงานผลการดำเนินงานโครงการระบบแจ้งเตือนภัยฉุกเฉินผ่านเครือข่ายโทรศัพท์เคลื่อนที่. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงาน กสทช.

Aloudat, A., & Michael, K. (2014). Toward the regulation of ubiquitous mobile government: A case study on location-based emergency services in Australia. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(4), 469–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9170-6

rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). (2022). Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Public Warning System (PWS) requirements (3GPP TS 22.268 V17.0.0). Valbonne, France: 3GPP.

European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). (2020). Emergency Communications (EMTEL); European Public Warning System (EU-ALERT) (ETSI TS 102 900 V1.3.1). Sophia Antipolis, France: ETSI.

Kaewpitak, P. (2020). The role of social media in disaster communication: A case study of Thailand. Journal of Emergency Management, 15(2), 112-125.

Rojsiraphisal, T. (2021). Urban disaster resilience: Assessing the awareness of Bangkok residents. Asian Geographer, 38(1), 15-30.

Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3-37.

Singkhajorn, S. (2021). Book review sociology in modules: Sociology in modules. STOU Academic Journal of Research and Innovation (Humanities and Social Science), 1(1), 58–61.

Tanwattana, P. (2018). Systematizing community-based disaster risk management (CBDRM): Case of urban flood-prone community in Thailand upstream area. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 798–812.

Wood, M. (2019). Next generation wireless emergency alerts. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 16(1), Article 20180045. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2018-0045

World Bank. (2019). Disaster risk management in Thailand: Status and way forward. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Praditsong , D., & singkhajorn, singh. (2026). Public Perception and Readiness of Thai Citizens towards the Cell Broadcast Service for Disaster Management. Journal of Management Science, Dhonburi Rajabhat University, 8(1), 36–46. retrieved from https://so10.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/msdru/article/view/3456