Unequal Rights: Analyzing Structural Accessibility and Political Participation of Persons with Disabilities in the Electoral Process

Authors

  • Tanpicha Rongjumroen College of Politics and Governance, Mahasarakham University

Keywords:

Political Participation of Persons with Disabilities, Electoral Access, Voting Rights Equality, Public Policy and Civil Rights, Perception of Participation

Abstract

In the context where Thailand and the global community accept the principle of inclusive elections that leave no one behind, the group of people with disabilities still faces structural obstacles in accessing fundamental rights, such as the right to vote. This research aims to analyze the relationship between access structures, which consist of polling stations, assistance services for accessibility, the role of social leaders, the perception of the right to participate, and the voter turnout rate of people with disabilities in Thailand. The study uses Pearson Correlation analysis with relevant secondary data. The results found that the structural factors have an extremely high correlation with each other ($r = 1.000, p < .001$), thus reflecting a service system that moves together in a centralized manner. Meanwhile, the relationship between perception of rights and voter turnout is positive ($r = .784$) but lacks statistical significance ($p > .05$). This outcome suggests that the participation of people with disabilities may not solely depend on the "provision" (technical aspects) alone, but also on the "feeling of having the right to participate." Therefore, this research proposes that designing fair electoral policies for people with disabilities needs to move beyond the framework of technical facilitation toward fostering a sense of entitlement, self-confidence, and creating a public space that supports the role of people with disabilities as equal citizens in a democracy.

References

Cornwall, A., & Nyamu-Musembi, C. (2004). Putting the “rights-based approach” to development into perspective. Third World Quarterly, 25(8), 1415–1437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000308447

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2006). Frequently Asked Questions on a Human Rights-Based Approach to Development Cooperation. United Nations.

United Nations. (2003). The Human Rights Based Approach to Development Cooperation: Towards a Common Understanding Among UN Agencies. United Nations

Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. UPIAS.

Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan Education UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).

People with Disability Australia. (n.d.). Models of disability.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined. Open Book Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0130

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). New York: United Nations.

OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. (2017). Handbook on observing and promoting the electoral participation of persons with disabilities. OSCE/ODIHR. https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/handbook-disabilities

International Foundation for Electoral Systems. (2018). Election access observation toolkit. IFES. https://www.ifes.org/tools-resources/election-access-observation-toolkit

Schur, L., & Kruse, D. (2014). Disability and voting accessibility in the 2012 elections: Final report to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Rutgers University.

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). The right to political participation of persons with disabilities. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2024). Political participation of persons with disabilities – 2024 update. Publications Office of the European Union.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการเลือกตั้ง. (2561). พระราชบัญญัติประกอบรัฐธรรมนูญว่าด้วยการเลือกตั้ง สมาชิกสภาผู้แทนราษฎร พ.ศ. 2561. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการเลือกตั้ง. (2566). การอำนวยความสะดวกให้กับคนพิการและผู้สูงอายุในวันเลือกตั้ง. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการเลือกตั้ง. https://www.ect.go.th

Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL). (2019). Legal measures concerning the rights of persons with disabilities to participate in the election under the Organic Act on the Election of Members of Parliament B.E. 2561 (2018). Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL). https://anfrel.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ANFREL- Research-Report-on-PWD-Participation-in-Election_Thailand.pdf

สุกัญญา จำนงค์บุญ. (2563). การเข้าถึงสิทธิในการเลือกตั้งของคนพิการ (วิทยานิพนธ์มหาบัณฑิต). มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.

ปาณิสสรา สุดชูเกียรติ. (2563). มาตรการทางกฎหมายในการช่วยเหลือหรืออำนวยความสะดวกแก่คนพิการทางการเห็นในการใช้สิทธิเลือกตั้งสมาชิกสภาผู้แทนราษฎร (วิทยานิพนธ์มหาบัณฑิต). จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย. DOI: 10.58837/CHULA.THE.2020.836.

พรปวีณ์ มีมากบาง. (2562). ปัญหาการใช้สิทธิเลือกตั้งของคนพิการในประเทศไทย. วารสารนิติศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, 48(3), 512–537. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rdi-aru/article/download/244126/167101

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.

Mitra, S. (2006). The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(4), 236–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060160040501

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการเลือกตั้ง. (2563). รายงานการส่งเสริมการมีส่วนร่วมทางการเมืองของคนพิการ. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการเลือกตั้ง. https://www.ect.go.th/

Downloads

Published

2026-09-04

How to Cite

Rongjumroen, T. (2026). Unequal Rights: Analyzing Structural Accessibility and Political Participation of Persons with Disabilities in the Electoral Process. PAAT Journal, 8(2), 72–88. retrieved from https://so10.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/paatj/article/view/3078

Issue

Section

Research Article