Empowering Public University Bodies for the Detection and Prevention of Academic Misconduct
Keywords:
Empowering Public University Bodies, Trading of works, Research, Academic works, Public universitiesAbstract
This article is a qualitative research. Data were collected by interviewing 20 key informants in this research, divided into 4 groups of 5 people each: 1) experts in the investigation of research and academic crime trading, 2) lawyers, 3) public administration scholars and 4) Executives of Public Universities. The objectives were to study the causes of research and academic work trading, preventive methods and solutions for research and academic work trading, and seek guidelines for establishing a special organization to manage the problem of research and academic work trading in state universities.
The research results found that the causes of research and academic work trading are: 1) conflict between goals and methods to achieve goals; 2) consideration of value for money rather than harm. For methods of prevention and problem solving, there should be training on facts, emphasizing knowledge of the impact of academic work trading, publicizing through the country's official media, emphasizing knowledge of the law, punishments, and impacts of academic work trading, based on the theory of public administration that emphasizes efficient and fair public administration, with a strict inspection and transparency system, and establishing a special organization to manage the problem of research and academic work trading in state universities by 1) establishing policies and work frameworks; 2) creating a special organization with expertise in inspection and implementation. The organization should have certification of independence and safety from external interference; 3) establishing a comprehensive and effective inspection system for inspection, using modern technology and tools to inspect and collect evidence, and taking appropriate legal action and punishment for offenders.
References
Zhou, Y. (2021). Academic fraud in Thai universities: The rise of research misconduct. Journal of Higher Education, 65(4), 123-145.
Office of the Higher Education Commission (OHEC). (2023). Annual report on academic integrity in Thai higher education institutions. Office of the Higher Education Commission.
Pham, T., & Taylor, S. (2022). Impact of academic fraud on public trust in Thai higher education. Educational Policy Review, 34(2), 67-82.
Chen, H., Li, J., & Wang, S. (2020). Factors influencing academic misconduct: A case study in Thai universities. International Journal of Educational Research, 52(3), 205-221.
Thammajak, P. (2022). Legal challenges in addressing academic fraud in Thailand. Thai Journal of Law and Education, 8(1), 99-115.
นิโรธรี จุลเหลา. (2567). ทฤษฎีการเมืองและจริยธรรมทางการเมือง [เอกสารไม่ได้ตีพิมพ์]. สาขาวิชารัฐประศาสนศาสตร์ คณะมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์, มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏอุบลราชธานี
Calayag, M. (2021). Research Management and Operation of State Universities and Colleges: A Key to Competitive Advantage. International Journal of Progressive Research in Science and Engineering. https://www.academia.edu/87769567/Research_Management_and_Operation_of_State_Universities_and_Colleges_A_Key_to_Competitive_Advantage?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054
Patwardhan, B., Desai, A., Chourasia, A., Nag, S., & Bhatnagar, R. (2020). Guidance Document: Good Academic Research Practices. University Grants Commission. https://www.ugc.gov.in/e-book/UGC_GARP_2020_Good%20Academic%20Research%20Practices.pdf?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054.
UGC. (2020). Guidance Document: Good Academic Research Practices. University Grants Commission. https://www.ugc.gov.in/e-book/UGC_GARP_2020_Good%20Academic%20Research%20Practices.pdf?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการอุดมศึกษา. (2562). พระราชบัญญัติการอุดมศึกษา พ.ศ. 2562. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการอุดมศึกษา.
คณะวิชาการ. (2562). ประมวลกฎหมายอาญา (ฉบับแก้ไขใหม่ล่าสุด) พ.ศ. 2563. The Justice Group.
สำนักงานการวิจัยแห่งชาติ. (2562). มาตรฐานการวิจัย. สำนักงานการวิจัยแห่งชาติ.
Chan, W. K. (2020). Strengthening academic integrity systems in public universities: A case study of Thailand. Journal of Higher Education Governance, 48(2), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhec.2020.05.002
Kim, J., & Kim, M. (2021). Enhancing academic misconduct detection in higher education: Strategies and implications. Higher Education Policy Review, 45(3), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hepr.2021.02.004
Nguyen, P., & Pham, T. (2022). Reporting mechanisms and accountability in universities: A model for preventing academic misconduct. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 18(4), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00207-7
Khan, S. (2019). Impact of academic fraud on higher education and scientific progress: A global perspective. Academic Integrity and Ethics Journal, 11(2), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3451830
Zhang, X., & Lee, K. H. (2021). Trust, integrity, and research misconduct: The consequences of academic fraud in higher education. Journal of Research Integrity, 14(2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12457-4
Wang, F., & Zhen, Q. (2020). Legal frameworks and challenges in preventing academic fraud in Thailand. Law and Education Review, 9(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3451831
Lee, S., & Lee, H. (2023). Special purpose organizations for academic integrity: Lessons from international case studies. Global Higher Education Review, 50(3), 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-023-00233-4
สำนักข่าวอิศรา. (2566). มีเอเจนซี่ดูแล! อว.สอบคู่ขนานซื้อ-แปะชื่องานวิจัย เข้าข่ายผิด 160 คน-ส่งตรวจอีกครึ่งร้อย. https://www.isranews.org/article/isranews-news/117969-isranews-ops.html
ดิศรณ์ ลิขิตวิทยาวุฒิ. (2566). ช่องโหว่ของกฎหมายอาญาไทย กรณีการซื้อผลงานทางวิชาการ. https://www.the101.world/the-law-of-buying-academic-papers/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 PAAT Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.