Fostering Thai Economy through the Perspective of Market Competition

Authors

  • Shinawat Horayangkura Director of Consumer Product Market Structure Division, Trade Competition Commission of Thailand
  • Panatchakorn Intapat Trade Competition Analyst, Trade Competition Commission of Thailand
  • Jirawat Metasuttirat Asst.Prof. Dr. School of Management Science, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University

Keywords:

Competition Policy, Economic Development, Economic Growth, Inequality

Abstract

Over the past years, Thailand has implemented diverse economic development policies. Nevertheless, empirical evidence suggests that during several recent decades, Thailand has encountered challenges hindering its economic growth and escalating economic inequality. This article contents that the missing crucial element in pursuing economic development may lie in market competition. In fact, the optimal level of market competition is the economic infrastructure which stimulates economic development through allocative efficiency, productive efficiency, and dynamic efficiency. This, in turn, leads to a better rate of economic growth while reducing inequality gap. Nevertheless, international experiences have shown that competition policy formation and implementation require vast support from the government and collaborative efforts from various entities, both government and private organizations. This article makes arguments on the importance of competition and competition policy development. Also, it provides experiences across countries. An optimal level of competition is a crucial economic platform to spur competitiveness and competitive advantages of Thailand in which could help alleviate economic problems including slow economic growth and high economic inequality.

References

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2534). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 7 (พ.ศ. 2535-2539). กรุงเทพฯ

Igelski, M. (2018). The role of intellectual capital in building a competitive advantage for companies from the Baltic Sea Region in the transport, shipping and logistic industry (TSL). In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 57, p. 01015). EDP Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185701015

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2023), Interaction between competition and industrial policies. From: https://unctad.org/system/files/officialdocument/ciclpd69_en.pdf

Tan, C. & Jie, M. N. (2016). The Role of Competition in Singapore’s Economic Growth and Public Policies.

European Parliament. (2013). The contribution of competition policy to growth and the EU 2020 strategy. From: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/492479/IPOL-ECON_ET(2013)492479_EN.pdf

European Commission. (2024). Why is competition policy important for consumers?. From: https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/about/why-competition-policy-important-consumers_en

Parveer, Ghuman S. & Udai S. Mehta, (2019). Institutional Design of Select Competition Authorities in South Asia: Identifying Challenges and Opportunities, Review of Industrial Organization, Springer. The Industrial Organization Society, 54(2), 283-326.

OECD (2023), The Consumer Welfare Standard - Advantages and Disadvantages Compared to Alternative Standards, OECD Competition Policy Roundtable Background Note. From: http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/consumer-welfare-standard-advantages-and-disadvantages-to-alternativestandards-2023.pdf.

Kennedy, J. (2018). Why the Consumer Welfare Standard Should Remain the Bedrock of Antitrust Policy. From: https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20181212/108774/HHRG-115-JU05-20181212-SD004.pdf

Mungan, M. C., Scalia, A., & Yun, J. M. (2024). A Reputational View of Antitrust’s Consumer Welfare Standard. Houston Law Review, 61. From: https://houstonlawreview.org/article/92813-a-reputational-view-of-antitrust-s-consumer-welfare-standard

Wilson, C. S. (2019). Welfare standards underlying antitrust enforcement: What you measure is what you get Federal Trade Commission. From: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/1455663/welfare_standard_speech_-_cmr-wilson.pdf (p. 12)

OECD. (2024). Pro-competitive Policy Reforms. From: http://www.oecd.org/competition/reforms

OECD. (2016). State-Owned Enterprises as Global Competitors: A Challenge or an Opportunity, OECD Publishing, Paris. From: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264262096-en.

Duan, Y. & Yu, K. (2022). Research on Competitive Neutrality of SOEs with Special Functions. China Sustainability, 14(13), 7810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137810

Negara, D. S. (2023). Principle Of Competitive Neutrality For State-Owned Enterprises To An Access To Justice On Business Practices. From: https://www.ptun-surabaya.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Jurnal-Dharma-Scopus-Q2.pdf

Sim, R. (2013) Making markets work for development: A reform agenda on competition-The speech to the World Bank Forum. From: https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/media/speeches/australias-experience-driving-economic-growth-through-competition-policy-reforms-speechexperience-driving-economic-growth-through-competition-policy-reforms

World Economics. (2024). The Global Authority on Geographic Invest ability. From: https://www.worldeconomics.com/country-reviews/australia/

The Global Innovation Index. (2023). Australia ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2023. From: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2023/au.pdf

The Global Innovation Index. (2023). Japan ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2023.From: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2023/jp.pdf

Hatta, T. (2017). Competition policy vs. industrial policy as a growth strategy. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). Working Papers DP-2016-40. From: https://ideas.repec.org/p/era/wpaper/dp-2016-40.html.

International Institute for Management Development (IMD). (2023). World Competitiveness Yearbook 2023. From https://www.imd.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/WCY_Booklet_2023-FINAL.pdf

The Global Innovation Index. (2023). Singapore ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2023. From: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2023/sg.pdf

Philippine Competition Commissions. (2015). Philippine Competition Law (R.A. 10667)

The World Bank. (2024). Markets and Competition Policy. Fostering growth and shared prosperity by opening and transforming markets. From: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/competition-policy

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Horayangkura, S., Intapat, P., & Metasuttirat, J. (2024). Fostering Thai Economy through the Perspective of Market Competition. PAAT Journal, 6(2), 157–171. retrieved from https://so10.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/paatj/article/view/1118

Issue

Section

Academic Article