Development Development of an Application-Integrated Competency-Based Training Package for LCD Television Power-Supply Work, Model RUS 02-03: Learning Achievement and Practical Competency Outcomes of Vocational Certificate Students

Main Article Content

Roongroj Utamartra

Abstract

This study aimed to 1) develop an application-integrated competency-based training package for LCD television power-supply work, Model RUS 02-03, and to evaluate its quality and determine its efficiency against the 80/80 criterion; 2) examine the learning achievement of students who learned with the package; 3) assess the students’ post-instruction practical competency against a predetermined criterion; and 4) examine their satisfaction with the package. A quasi-experimental nonequivalent control-group pretest–posttest design was employed. The participants were 30 vocational certificate electronics students (19 in the experimental group and 11 in the control group), and a subsequent cohort of 12 students provided supporting evidence. The instruments were the training package, a quality evaluation form, a learning achievement test, a practical competency rubric, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, E1/E2 efficiency indices, t-tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The results showed that 1) the package was rated at the highest quality level (x¯ = 4.61,
SD = 0.49) and achieved an E1/E2 efficiency of 82.76/82.63, meeting the 80/80 criterion; 2) the experimental group's posttest scores (x¯ = 33.05) were significantly higher than its pretest scores (x¯ = 20.63) (t(18) = 17.48, p < .001, dz = 4.01), and after controlling for pretest scores, its adjusted posttest mean was 5.20 points higher than that of the control group (95% CI [2.95, 7.46]; F(1, 27) = 22.35, p < .001, partial η² = .453); the subsequent cohort showed results in the same direction (E1/E2 = 90.00/89.38; t(11) = 17.59, p < .001); 3) most students in the experimental group met the predetermined practical competency criterion (17 of 19 students, 89.47%), with a mean score of 17.42 out of 20 (SD = 1.43), significantly above the 16-point criterion (t(18) = 4.33, p < .001); practical competency was assessed only after instruction in the experimental group; and 4) overall satisfaction was at the highest level (x¯ = 4.52, SD = 0.34). In conclusion, students in the experimental group showed higher learning achievement, and most of them met the predetermined practical competency criterion. The findings support the use of the training package for teaching LCD television power-supply work within the context studied.

Article Details

How to Cite
Utamartra, R. (2026). Development Development of an Application-Integrated Competency-Based Training Package for LCD Television Power-Supply Work, Model RUS 02-03: Learning Achievement and Practical Competency Outcomes of Vocational Certificate Students. Journal of Technical and Engineering Education, 17(2), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.14416/j.ftee.2026.08.03
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Roongroj Utamartra, Minburi Technical College

Teacher, Department of Electronics Minburi Technical College, Institute of Vocational Education, Bangkok.

References

1. S. McGrath, M. Mulder, J. Papier, and R. Suart, Eds., Handbook of Vocational Education and Training: Developments in the Changing World of Work. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019. [Online]. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94532-3

2. UNESCO Office Bangkok and Regional Bureau for Education in Asia and the Pacific, Learner-Centred Teaching in Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Perspectives and Reviews of Six Asia-Pacific Countries. Paris, France, and Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384610 (Accessed: Aug. 20, 2026).

3. M. Mulder, Ed., Competence-Based Vocational and Professional Education: Bridging the Worlds of Work and Education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017. [Online]. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4

4. J. Sangwanglao, “Competency-Based Education Reform of Thailand’s Basic Education System: A Policy Review,” ECNU Review of Education, OnlineFirst, Apr. 9, 2024, doi: 10.1177/20965311241240486.

5. Office of the Vocational Education Commission, Vocational Certificate Curriculum B.E. 2562 (Revised B.E. 2565): Industrial Trades, Electronics Program. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Education, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://bsq.vec.go.th/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2026/05/20105v2.pdf (Accessed: Aug. 20, 2026) (in Thai)

6. S. Phowong, “The Development of Audio Equipment Competency Training Board SMP 88–96, Audio Equipment Course, code of 20105-2008,” Journal of Technical and Engineering Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 82–96, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.14416/j.ftee.2024.12.08 (in Thai)

7. S. Kongsintu and N. Suksong, “Construction of Teaching Package on Servo motor Control with PLC,” Journal of Technical and Engineering Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 16–29, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.14416/j.ftee.2023.08.02 (in Thai)

8. P. Sornla and W. Weerasin, “Development and Training of User Interface Training Kit for Smart Farm Control System,” Journal of Technical and Engineering Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 40–48, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.14416/j.ftee.2024.04.04 (in Thai)

9. S. Chuenchomnakjad, P. Promseenong, and P. Sema, “Creation and Efficiency Determination of a Modular Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Practice Set According to the National Skilled Labor Standards,” Journal of Technical and Engineering Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29–39, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.14416/j.ftee.2024.04.03 (in Thai)

10. T. Chaimongkhol, “The Development of an Embedded Systems and Internet of Things Training Kit using Raspberry Pi Pico W for Practical Learning for Information Technology Students,” Journal of Technical and Engineering Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 18–33, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.14416/j.ftee.2026.04.02 (in Thai)

11. L. Pan and A. Filippova, “A critical examination on EdTech integration in TVET curriculum: Insights from a Chinese TVET institution,” Vocation, Technology & Education, vol. 1, no. 2, Jun. 2024, Article no. e12, doi: 10.54844/vte.2024.0593.

12. C. Brahmawong, “Developmental testing of media and instructional package,” Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–20, Jan.–Jun. 2013. (in Thai)

13. A. J. Vickers and D. G. Altman, “Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements,” BMJ, vol. 323, no. 7321, pp. 1123–1124, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123.

14. D. Lakens, “Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 4, Nov. 2013, Article no. 863, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.

15. B. A. Nosek and T. M. Errington, “What is replication?” PLOS Biology, vol. 18, no. 3, Mar. 2020, Article no. e3000691, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691.

16. J. W. Best, Research in Education, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1981.

17. P. Thongmee, “The development of the EM 09–11 electrical machinery competency training set for vocational education,” Journal of Applied Education, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 59–74, Oct. 2025. (in Thai)