Improving Grade 6 Students’ English Speaking Skills Through The Communicative Approach At Government High School No.1, Myitkyina, Myanmar
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to improve the English speaking skills of Grade 6 students at Government High School No.1 in Myitkyina, Myanmar through the application of the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach. The research was motivated by persistent deficiencies in oral English proficiency among Myanmar primary learners, where traditional instruction has been largely grammar-focused and lacking in communicative practice. A quasi-experimental one-group pre-test/post-test design was employed over six months (October 2024–March 2025). Twenty Grade 6 students (out of 45) were purposively selected as the sample.
The intervention consisted of eight weekly lessons using CLT techniques such as role-plays, pair work, group discussions, interviews, and language games, all integrated with the Grade 6 English curriculum. Speaking performance was measured before and after the intervention using an analytic rubric assessing four criteria: fluency, pronunciation, vocabulary, and interaction. Supplementary data were collected via a student attitude survey and classroom observations to capture qualitative changes in confidence and participation.
The results showed a statistically significant improvement in students’ speaking performance after the intervention (paired t-test, p < 0.05). Post-test scores were markedly higher across all four speaking aspects, indicating gains in fluency, clearer pronunciation, broader vocabulary usage, and more active conversational interaction. Survey responses also reflected increased student confidence and enjoyment in speaking activities, and observations noted greater student engagement and reduced anxiety during English speaking tasks. The findings demonstrate that the Communicative Approach is effective in enhancing young EFL learners’ speaking skills in a Myanmar public school context. This study’s outcomes offer practical implications for English language teachers, curriculum developers, and policymakers in Myanmar by providing an evidence-based model for implementing learner-centered, communicative pedagogy at the primary school level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Darasawang, P. (2007). English language teaching and education in Thailand: A decade of change. In D. Prescott (Ed.), English in Southeast Asia: Varieties, literacies and literatures (pp. 187–204). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107.
Gaynor, B. (2021). English curriculum development in Myanmar. Muroran Institute of Technology Higher Education Research, 3, 1–12.
Khin Su Su Win. (2021). The English language teaching approach and the challenges presented by Myanmar ELT teachers. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 10(1), 1251–1255.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Lwin, M. M. (2019). An analytical study of English teaching skills of teachers in government high schools in Myanmar [Master’s thesis, Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University].
Matsuda, A. (2011). Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language. Multilingual Matters.
Ministry of Education. (2016). National Education Strategic Plan 2016-21. Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Strategic Plan 2021–2030 (Draft). www.mnee.gov.mm.
Myo Myint Thu. (2020). Myanmar youth and impact of English language proficiency on employment opportunities. Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125945209.pdf.
Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Heinle Cengage Learning. www.wgtn.ac.nz.
Pham, H. H. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT Journal, 61(3), 193-201.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). International Universities Press. (Original work published 1936). https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
Punthumasen, P. (2007). International program for teacher education: An approach to improving English teaching and learning in Thailand. CSTLT (Cancun, Mexico).
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Savignon, S. J. (2018). Communicative competence. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
Tan, M. C., & Tan, A. S. (2020). Implementing communicative language teaching in the ASEAN context: A review of challenges and successes in Thailand and Vietnam. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 425–435.
Thane, N. A. A. (2024). The development of English speaking skills using online collaborative learning for Myanmar migrant students in Thailand [Master’s thesis, Rangsit University]. RSUIR at Rangsit University.
UNESCO. (2014). National EFA review report: Myanmar. https://unesdoc. unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000229723.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
