Development of English Speaking Skills Using Active Learning Strategies for Grade Ten Students of Basic Education High School in Htonebo, Myanmar
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the impact of active learning strategies on the development of English speaking skills among Grade Ten students at Basic Education High School in Htonebo, Myanmar. In the Myanmar educational context, traditional teacher-centered approaches continue to dominate English language instruction, often limiting students’ opportunities to actively use the language in communicative situations. As a result, students frequently struggle with speaking fluency, confidence, and interactive competence. This study was conducted to address these challenges by integrating active learning strategies into English language teaching.
A quasi-experimental research design was used, involving two groups: an experimental group taught with active learning strategies, and a control group taught using conventional methods. The study employed pre-test and post-test assessments to measure improvement in students’ speaking performance. The active learning techniques implemented included pair and group discussions, role-plays, think-pair-share activities, storytelling, and information gap exercises. Data collection consisted of speaking tests, classroom observations, and student feedback.
The results indicated that the experimental group showed significantly greater improvement in speaking fluency, vocabulary usage, pronunciation, and overall confidence compared to the control group. Moreover, students in the experimental group reported higher levels of motivation and engagement, and a noticeable reduction in anxiety related to speaking English. These findings suggest that active learning strategies effectively create a more supportive and interactive learning environment, thereby enhancing students’ speaking competence.
This article concludes that integrating active learning strategies into secondary English classrooms can significantly improve students’ oral communication skills. The study recommends that English teachers in Myanmar adopt more student-centered teaching methods and receive training in active learning techniques. By shifting away from passive learning and toward active participation, students can gain the confidence and practice needed to become more competent English speakers in real-world contexts.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. George Washington University.
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge.
Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters.
Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.
Lwin, S. M. (2019). Promoting English language learning in Myanmar: Issues and challenges. Journal of World Languages, 5(3), 186-206.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill.
Phajirawattanachat, S. (2025). The development of an English teaching model to promote English communication skills of Mathayom 3 students (ICFS Model). Journal of Education Khon Kaen University, 48(1), 106–126.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Siriwong, N. (2023). Development of English learning activities on the topic of English for daily life based on activity-based learning for Prathomsuksa 4 students [Master’s thesis, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University]. Thai Digital Collection.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Routledge.
Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. Longman.
Tun, S. (2016). The effectiveness of communicative language teaching on students’ speaking ability in Myanmar. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 785–792. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0704.22.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Xiuqin, Z. (2006). Speaking skills and anxiety. CELEA Journal, 29(1), 34–39.
Yamchai, N. (2016). The use of task-based learning to enhance English oral presentation skill for 1st year students [Master’s thesis, Silpakorn University]. Silpakorn University Repository.
