Value and Liquidity Effects in the Thai Stock Market: Evidence from Fama-MacBeth Cross-Sectional Regressions and the Role of Financial Statement Consolidation Status

Main Article Content

Wittawat Kadthan

Abstract

This study examines three cross-sectional return anomalies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET): the value premium (proxied by price-to-book value, P/BV), an illiquidity premium (proxied by trading turnover), and whether the value premium's strength depends on financial statement type (consolidated versus company-only), as predicted by the information uncertainty hypothesis. Evidence on these anomalies in Southeast Asia remains thinner than in developed markets and has not previously been tested jointly at high frequency (Charoenwong et al., 2021; Saengchote, 2021). Weekly security-level data were retrieved via the SETSMART API for common stocks, yielding a panel of 233,584 firm-week observations from 1,045 firms across 285 weeks (January 2021-June 2026). The Fama-MacBeth (1973) two-stage procedure was applied at quarterly, monthly, and weekly frequencies. The value premium is negative and significant at the weekly frequency, strengthening as frequency increases; a one-standard-deviation difference in log(P/BV) corresponds to an estimated 4.9 percent difference in annualized return. Neither turnover nor market capitalization shows a significant relationship with forward returns at any frequency. The value premium is significant in both the consolidated and company-only subsamples, but the interaction term testing the difference between groups is not significant, offering no support for the information uncertainty hypothesis, though the smaller company-only subsample (208 firms versus 777) limits this test's power. The findings support value-based investment strategies in Thailand but lend no support to turnover-based liquidity timing, contributing new, frequency-robust evidence on the joint behavior of these anomalies in a Southeast Asian equity market.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kadthan, W. (2026). Value and Liquidity Effects in the Thai Stock Market: Evidence from Fama-MacBeth Cross-Sectional Regressions and the Role of Financial Statement Consolidation Status. SSRU International Journal of Management Science (IJMS), 13(2), 1–14. Retrieved from https://so10.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ssru/article/view/3788
Section
Reseach Article

References

Acharya, V. V., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005). Asset pricing with liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 375–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.007

Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6

Asness, C. S., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2013). Value and momentumevery where. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 929–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12021

Asparouhova, E., Bessembinder, H., & Kalcheva, I. (2010). Liquidity biases in asset pricing tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.011

Balachandran, S. V., Kuntluru, S., Manchiraju, H., & Rajput, S. (2026). The informativeness of consolidated and parent-only earnings to investors: Evidence from India. Contemporary Accounting Research, 43(1), 236–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.70013

Cakici, N., Fabozzi, F. J., & Tan, S. (2013). Size, value, and momentum in emerging market stock returns. Emerging Markets Review, 16, 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2013.03.001

Cakici, N., Tang, Y., & Yan, A. (2016). Do the size, value, and momentum factors drivestock returns in emerging markets? Journal of International Money and Finance, 69, 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.06.001

Charoenwong, B., Nettayanun, S., & Saengchote, K. (2021). Digesting anomalies: A q-factor approach for the Thai market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 69, 101647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101647

Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2002). Breadth of ownership and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 66(2–3), 171–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00223-4

Chen, X., Wang, J., & Zhong, X. (2024). Return predictability of prospect theory: Evidence from the Thailand stock market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 83, 102199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102199

Comporek, M. (2023).The quality of earnings reported in financial statements of capital groups. Journal of Finance and Financial Law, S2, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.S2.2023.11

Datar, V. T., Naik, N. Y., & Radcliffe, R. (1998). Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative test. Journal of Financial Markets, 1(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(97)00004-9

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. TheJournal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05202.x

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.011

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2018). Choosing factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(2), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.012

Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636. https://doi.org/10.1086/260061

Hong, H., Lim, T., & Stein, J. C. (2000). Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 265–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00206

Hou, K., Karolyi, G. A., & Kho, B.-C. (2011). What factors drive global stock returns?

The Review of Financial Studies, 24(8), 2527–2574. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr013

Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x

Jiang, G., Lee, C. M. C., & Zhang, Y. (2005). Information uncertainty and expected returns. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2–3), 185–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1528-2

Kitkanasiri, C., Palahan, S., & Pan-urai, J. (2025). Contrasting market dynamics: The Fama-French model in the SET and MAI of Thailand. Journal of Applied Economics and Management Strategy, 12(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.56825/jaems.2025.1215941

Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541–1578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb02456.x

Lam, K. S. K., & Tam, L. H. K. (2011). Liquidity and asset pricing: Evidence from the Hong Kong stock market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2217–2230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.01.015

Pástor, Ľ., & Stambaugh, R. F. (2003). Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 642–685. https://doi.org/10.1086/374184

Perez, G. A. (2017a). Company size effect in the stock market of Thailand. International Journal of Financial Research, 8(3), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v8n3p105

Perez, G. A. (2017b). Value investing in the stock market of Thailand. International Journal of Financial Studies, 5(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs5040030

Pham, C. T. B., Nguyen, L. H., & Vu, T. T. M. (2025). COVID-19 and liquidity dynamics: Analyzing ASEAN-6 stock markets during and post-pandemic. SAGE Open, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251336112

Rosenberg, B., Reid, K., & Lanstein, R. (1985). Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 11(3), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1985.409007

Rouwenhorst, K. G. (1999). Local return factors and turnover in emerging stock markets.

The Journal of Finance, 54(4), 1439–1464. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00151

Saengchote, K. (2021). New evidence on the value premium in Thailand (SSRN Working Paper No. 3856044). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3856044

Zhang, X. F. (2006). Information uncertainty and stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 105–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00831.x