Developing Student Teachers' Reading, Summarizing, and Valuing the Teaching Professional through Active Reading on the Moral Pathway
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to 1) develop active reading activities on the moral pathway to enhancing student teachers' reading ability, write a summary, and valuing the teaching profession, and 2) study student teachers' reading ability, writing a summary, and valuing the teaching profession after learning through active reading activities on the moral pathway. The participants comprised 15 first-year student teachers enrolled in academic year 2024 at UdonThani Rajabhat University in Faculty of Education, Thailand. The participants were selected through submitted on the need to develop reading ability, writing a summary and valuing the teaching profession. This study employed a One-group posttest-only design. The instruments used in this research were 1) three active reading activities on the moral pathway: 1) If the World Had No Books, 2) Joyful Reading, Delightful Summarizing, and 3) Reading with Heart, Sharing with Love – Reading Aloud Techniques for Children (with a Moral Focus), 2) reading and writing summary assessment form and 3) valuing the teaching profession questionnaire. This study found that, the practical experience notably improved students’ reading ability, enabling them to select age-appropriate texts, identify key points, and read fluently with accurate pronunciation and expressive intonation. Their summarizing skills advanced, particularly in conveying stories concisely while emphasizing embedded moral values, and they employed both written and creative visual formats to communicate effectively. The activities also strengthened students’ appreciation for the teaching profession. Through interactive reading sessions and instructor feedback, they gained confidence, enhanced public speaking abilities, and refined skills in body language, voice modulation, and storytelling rhythm competencies vital for future teachers.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
References
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom.
ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: George Washington
University.
Khaemmani, T. (2014). The Art of Teaching: Knowledge for Effective Learning Process
Management. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Fullan, M. (2013). Great to Excellent: Launching the Next Stage of Ontario’s Education
Agenda. Ontario Ministry of Education.
Chaimin, C., Phuthima, S., Takaew, T., & Surinta, E. (2021). Reading Behavior of
Undergraduate Students at Chiang Mai Rajabhat University. Journal of Humanities
and Social Sciences, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, 3(2), 59–77. Retrieved from
https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/husocjr/article/view/248666
Rattanawichit, S. (2020). Developing student teachers’ summary skills using analytical
reading techniques. Journal of Education, Chiang Mai University, 17(2), 80–94.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
National Research and Moral Development Institute. (2020). Research Report on Literature
and the Promotion of Fundamental Moral Values among Thai Youth. Bangkok: Office
of the National Moral Promotion Commission.
Thongphun, S. (2019). The use of moral literature to develop reflective thinking in student
teachers. Naresuan University Journal of Education, 21(2), 45–58.