How Does Tontine Benefit Thai Elderly?

Authors

  • Sunti Tirapat Nida Business School, National Institute of Development Administration

Keywords:

Elderly, Tontine, Saving

Abstract

Tontine has recently been considered as a financial instrument that alleviates the elderly’s longevity risks. The study compares the characteristics of tontine with the available products such as annuities and lottery linked savings accounts. Using the simulation of the hypothetical investment of an elderly aged 60, it is found that the average present value of the payoff from tontine increases as the number of investors in the investment pool increases; and levels off after the number of investors reach 100 investors. The payoff is not normally distributed with high positive skewness and fat tail. The natural tontine and annuity exhibit the same payoff characteristics as expected. The flat tontine, however, yields lower average present value of the payoff but higher positive skewness. This characteristic is suitable for the risk seeking investors. Further analysis shows that the flat tontine with the return of 3% yields the same average present value of the payoff to the comparable Government Saving Bank’s lottery linked savings. But the tontine payoff has greater volatility and right skewness. The lottery linked savings is more appropriate for risk averse elderly who have a strong bequest motive. The lottery linked savings also provides liquidity since the elderly can redeem the principal, while the tontine is irrevocable. In conclusion, the tontine can serve as a savings instrument for those who prefer a high risk alternative. The Thai government should encourage using various financial instruments to cope with the aging society to lessen their future fiscal burden. Although this study is limited to the standard type of tontine, it can be structured in the context of Thai elderly. This should be left for further study.

References

Benartzi, S., A. Previtero, and R. H. Thaler. 2011. “Annuitization Puzzles.” Journal of Economic Perspective, 25 (4): 143-164.

Blake, D. 1999. “Annuity Markets: Problems and Solutions.” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance -Issues and Practice, 24: 358-375.

Beshears, J., J. J. Choi, D. Laibson, B. C. Madrian, and S. P. Zeldes. 2014. “What makes annuitization more appealing?” Journal of Public Economics, 116: 2-16.

Brown, J. 2009. Understanding the Role of Annuities in Retirement Planning. In Annamaria Lusardi, ed., Overcoming the Savings Slump: How to Increase the Effectiveness of Financial Education and Saving Programs. University of Chicago Press: 178-206.

Cole, S.A., B. Iverson, and P. Tufano. 2021. “Can Gambling Increase Savings? Empirical Evidence on PrizeLinked Savings Accounts.” Management Science (forthcoming).

Cohen, Jacob. 1953. “The Element of Lottery in British Government Bonds, 1694-1919.” Economica, 20: 237-246.

Dizon, Felipe and T. Lybbert. 2021. “Leveraging the Lottery for Financial Inclusion: Lotto-Linked Savings Accounts in Haiti.” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 69 (4): 1323-1349.

Filiz-Ozbay, E., J. Guryan, K. Hyndman, M.S Kearney, and E.Y. Ozbay. 2015. “Do Lottery Payments Induce Savings Behavior? Evidence from the Lab.” Journal of Public Economics, 126 (June): 1-24.

Fullmer, R. K. and J. B. Forman. 2020. “State-sponsored Pensions for Private Sector Workers: The Case for Pooled Annuities and Tontines.” Wharton Pension Research Council Working Paper.

Fullmer, R. K. 2019. “Tontines: A Practitioner’s Guide to Mortality-Pooled Investments.” CFA Institute Research Foundation Briefs.

Gertler, P., S. Higgins, A. Scott, and E. Seira. 2021. “Increasing Financial Inclusion and Attracting Deposits through Prize-Linked Savings.” Working Paper. UC Berkeley.

Hu, W.Y. and J. S. Scott. 2007. “Behavioral Obstacles in the Annuity Market.” Financial Analysts Journal, 63: 71-82.

Iwry, J. M., C. Haldeman, W. G. Gale, and D. John. 2020. “Retirement Tontines: Using a Classical Finance Mechanism as an Alternative Source of Retirement Income.” Brookings Institute Report.

Lange, Andreas & List, John A. & Price, Michael K., 2007. “A fundraising mechanism inspired by historical tontines: Theory and experimental evidence.” Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Vol. 91 (9): 1750-1782.

McKeever, Kent. 2009. “A short History of Tontines.” Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 15 (2): 49-509.

Milevsky, M.A. 2014. “Portfolio choice and longevity risk in the late seventeenth century: A re-examination of the first English tontine.” Financial History Review, 21 (3): 225-258.

Milevsky, M. A. 2015. “King William’s Tontine: Why the Retirement Annuity of the Future Should Resemble Its Past.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Milevsky, M.A. and T.S. Salisbury. 2015. “Optimal Retirement Income Tontines.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 64: 91-105.

Modigliani, F. 1986. “Life cycle, individual thrift, and the wealth of nations.” Science, 234: 704-712.

Newfield, P. 2014. “The Tontine: An Improvement on the Conventional Annuity?” Journal of Retirement 1 (3): 37-48.

Ransom, R., and R. Sutch. 1987. “Tontine Insurance and the Armstrong Investigation: A Case of Stifled Innovation, 1868-1905.” The Journal of Economic History, 47 (2): 379-390.

Tufano P. 2008. “Saving Whilst Gambling: An Empirical Analysis of UK Premium Bonds.” American Economic Review, 98 (2): 321-326.

Tufano P., N. Maynard, J.E. De Neve. 2008. “Consumer demand for prize-linked savings: A preliminary analysis.” Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 08-061, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-13

How to Cite

Tirapat, S. (2022). How Does Tontine Benefit Thai Elderly?. NIDA Business Journal, (29), 51–70. Retrieved from https://so10.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NIDABJ/article/view/61

Issue

Section

Research Articles