The Route Back Home? The Challenges of Migrant Reintegration Policies in Ecuador
Keywords:
Reintegration, Migration, Return migration, Social protection, Daniel Noboa, Rafael Correa, Deportations, EcuadorAbstract
The increasing number of Ecuadorian migrants forcibly deported from the United States presents a pressing challenge to Ecuador’s social protection system. This article compares the current return plan called “Ecuador es tu Hogar” (Ecuador is your home) developed by Daniel Noboa's liberal government, with the past reintegration program “Bienvenid@s a Casa” (Welcome Home) designed during the regime of former left-wing president Rafael Correa. The objective of this study is to determine the characteristics that two distinct ideological regimes considered in their response to returnees and their reintegration. Through the Most Similar Systems Design methodology, the research sought to identify the variables that impacted the execution of these policies, as well as the influence that the ideological framework had on their construction. As such, the study demonstrates that the current reintegration policies are affected by independent variables like the profile of the returnees, the investment available, and the role of migrants in development that shaped each government. The main findings consider that reintegration policies focusing only on economic aid fall short under complex social environments and lack long-term political vision. Based on this, the study intends to contribute to the overall discourse surrounding the intersection of migration and social policy, particularly relevant through the current context of deportations and protection challenges, while arguing for a shift toward a rights-based, inclusive approach to reintegration, supported by evaluation mechanisms, intersectoral collaboration, and investment in social protection systems.
References
Anckar, C. (2008). On the applicability of the most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401552
Arowolo, O. O. (2000). Return migration and the problem of reintegration. International Migration, 38(5), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00128
Boccagni, P., & Lagomarsino, F. (2011). Migration and the global crisis: new prospects for return? the case of Ecuadorians in Europe. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 30(3), 282–297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41238220
Bommes, M., & Geddes, A. (Eds.). (2000). Immigration and welfare: challenging the borders of the welfare state (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464526
Cassarino, J.P. (2004). Theorising return migration: the conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6(2), 253–279.
Center for Engagement and Advocacy in the Americas. (2024). Ecuador at a crossroads: the intersection of violence, migration, and displacement. https://www.weareceda.org/s/CEDA-Ecuador-at-a-Crossroads-2024.pdf
Cerase, F. P. (1967). A study of Italian migrants returning from the U.S.A. International Migration Digest, 1(3), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791836700100307
Cerase, F. P. (1974). Expectations and reality: a case study of return migration from the United States to southern Italy. The International Migration Review, 8(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.2307/3002783
de la Torre, C. (2014). The people, democracy, and authoritarianism in Rafael Correa's Ecuador. Constellations, 21(4), 457-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12117
Ellner, S. (2012). Latin America’s new left in power: the governments of Hugo Chavez, Evo Morales and Rafael Correa. Latin American Perspectives, 39(1), 96-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X11425333
Esping-Andersen, G. (1989). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
Faist, T., Bilecen, B., Barglowski, K., & Sienkiewicz, J. J. (2015), Transnational social protection: migrants' strategies and patterns of inequalities. Population Space and Place, 21(3), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1903
Federico, R. C. (1973). The social welfare institution: an introduction. D.C. Heath and Company.
Flechtner, S., & Middelanis, M. (2024). The role of the commodity price boom in shaping public social spending: evidence from Latin America. World Development, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106717
Gmelch, G. (1980). Return migration. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 135–159. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155732
Hagan, J. M., & Wassink, J. T. (2020). Return migration around the world: an integrated agenda for future research. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 533-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-120319-015855
Herrera, G., Moncayo, M. I., & Escobar, A. (2012). Perfil migratorio del Ecuador 2011. International Organization for Migration. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/perfil_migratorio_del_ecuador2011.pdf
Herrera, G. (2021). Del éxodo ecuatoriano a la migración Venezolana: veinte años de política migratoria en Ecuador. Flacso.
Herrera, G. (2022). Migration and migration policy in Ecuador in 2000 - 2021. United Nations Development Programme.
Hong, W., & Zhou, B. (2025). Convergence and diversity: how collective risk perception shapes public compliance behaviour - a case study of China's Covid-19 response. Health research policy and systems, 23(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01311-1
International Organization for Migration. (2024). Analysis of the migration flow of the Ecuadorian population abroad. International Organization for Migration. http://crisisresponse.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl1481/files/appeal/documents/ANALYSIS%20OF%20THE%20MIGRATION%20FLOW%20OF%20ECUADORIAN%20POPULATION%20ABROAD.pdf
Jones, C. (Ed.). (1977). Immigration and Social Policy in Britain (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315014258
King, D. S., & Waldron, J. (1988). Citizenship, social citizenship and the defence of welfare provision. British Journal of Political Science, 18(4), 415–443. http://www.jstor.org/stable/193879
King, R. (Ed.). (1986). Return migration and regional economic problems. Croom Helm.
Kuschminder, K. (2017). Reintegration strategies: conceptualizing how return migrants reintegrate. Springer Nature / Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55741-0
Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Koppenjan, J. (2019). Government strategies in addressing three protests against PX plants in urban China: comparing cases using a most-similar-system design. Policy Studies, 43(3), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1624710
Luna, B. (2025, May 2025). Ecuador: segundo mandato de Noboa, crisis económica e inseguridad. CELAG Data. https://www.celag.org/ecuador-segundo-mandato-de-noboa-crisis-economica-e-inseguridad/
Mazzolini, S. (2021). Rafael Correa and the citizen’s revolution in Ecuador. In P. Ostiguy, F. Panizza, & B. Moffitt (Eds.), Populism Global Perspective: A Performative and Discursive Approach. Routledge
Ministry of Economy and Finances. (2025). Proforma del presupuesto general del estado: reporte consolidado comparativo - por funcional. Ministry of Economy and Finances. https://www.finanzas.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2025/08/22CN_Por-Funcional.pdf
Nabernegg, M. (2024, August 22 - 30). Extreme income inequality in Ecuador - dollarization, commodity price boom and citizen revolution in Ecuador [Conference session]. 38th IARIW General Conference, London, England. https://iariw.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Nabernegg_DINA_Ecuador_IARIW.pdf
National Institute of Statistics and Census. (2024). Encuesta national de Empleo, Desempleo y Subempleo. ENEMDU Anual. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/enemdu-anual/
National Institute of Statistics and Census. (2025). Encuesta nacional de Empleo, Desempleo y Subempleo (ENEMDU): Indicadores de Pobreza y Desigualdad. Junio 2025. INEC. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/POBREZA/2025/Junio/202506_PobrezayDesigualdad.pdf
National Institute of Statistics and Census. (2025). Entradas y salidas internacionales. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/entradas-y-salidas-internacionales/
National Secretariat of the Migrant (SENAMI). (2007). Plan nacional de desarrollo humano para las migraciones 2007- 2010.
Primicias. (2025, January 25). 80 migrantes ecuatorianos llegan al país en vuelo adicional de deportados desde Estados Unidos. https://www.primicias.ec/politica/vuelo-adicional-deportacion-ecuatorianos-estados-unidos-donald-trump-88510/
Primicias. (2025, February 04). Gobierno de Ecuador decreta entrega de USD 470 por tres meses a los migrantes deportados de Estados Unidos. https://www.primicias.ec/politica/daniel-noboa-sueldo-migrantes-deportados-estados-unidos-89001/
Primicias. (2025, August 29). Jóvenes en acción y otros bonos elevan el gasto en ayudas sociales en 2025, según Proforma. https://www.primicias.ec/economia/jovenes-accion-daniel-noboa-bonos-proforma-103884/
Primicias. (2025, September 8). El Presupuesto 2025 de Ecuador muestra un estado con el 80% del gasto atado y sin margen de acción. Primicias. https://www.primicias.ec/revistagestion/analisis/presupuesto-general-estado-ecuador-gasto-deuda-ingresos-104506/
Rosas, P. (2024). Supervivencia de la ideología política en los gobiernos de América Latina. Sociología y Política Hoy (10), 244 - 262. https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/hoy/article/view/7903
Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Waite, M. (2003). Migration and social protection: a concept paper. (Working Paper - T2). Development Research Centre on Migration, Globalization and Poverty, University of Sussex, Brighton. http://www.issa.int/ger/layout/set/print/content/download/39544/772256/file/2sabates-wheeler.pdf
Schurr, C., & Stolz, M. (2010). “Bienvenid@s a casa”–return schemes and the remigration process of Ecuadorian female migrants. Iberoamericana (2001-), 10(39), 55–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41677165
Stefansson, A. (2004). Homecomings to the future: from diasporic mythographies to social projects of return. In F. Markowitz & A. Stefansson. (Eds.), Homecomings: Unsettling paths of return. Lexington Books.
United Nations Fund for Population Activities. (2008). Ecuador: la migración internacional en cifras. https://www.flacsoandes.edu.ec/web/imagesFTP/7586.6721.migracion_ecuador_en_cifras_2008.pdf
van Houte, M., & Davids, T. (2008). Development and return migration: from policy panacea to migrant perspective sustainability. Third World Quarterly, 29(7), 1411–1429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802386658
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Social Policy, Social Change and Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The manuscripts published in the Journal of Social Policy and Sustainable Development is the copyright of the Journal of Social Policy and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Social Administration, Thammasat University
Any article or opinion appeared in the Journal of Social Policy and Sustainable Development will solely be under the responsibility of the author The Faculty of Social Administration, Thammasat University and the editors do not need to reach in agreement or hold any responsibility.